SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohlson, C.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Ydreborg, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ohlson, C.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Ydreborg, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Participants and Non-participants of Different Categories in a Health Survey: A Cross-sectional Register Study

Carl-Göran Ohlson

From the Department of Occupational Medicine, Medical Center Hospital, S-70185 Örebro, Sweden

Berit Ydreborg

From the Department of Occupational Medicine, Medical Center Hospital, S-70185 Örebro, Sweden

Participants and non-participants in a health survey of asbestos cement workers were compared, using data from public registers, i.e. variables of socio-medical relevance. The plant closed down in 1976 and 3 years later all living subjects, 985 persons, were offered a health examination. The participation rate was 57%. The non-participants were divided into four categories: I, those who answered the invitation but refused to participate; II, those who did not answer even after three invitations; III, those who answered and accepted but did not participate; and IV, those who participated partly. A very consistent pattern of differences between participants and non-participants was observed, the latter being significantly more often registered for Public Assistance, for heavy drinking habits or criminal offences, and had significantly lower incomes and occupational status. The sickness absence, however, was not significantly shorter among the participants. The non-participating categories II and III differed most from the participants. Category I was more similar to the participants than to the other non-participating categories. This heterogeneity of the non-response/non-participation concept should be considered when health survey data are interpreted.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 13, No. 2, 67-74 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/140349488501300203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement