This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Laubjerg, M. Articles by Petersson, B. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Laubjerg, M. Articles by Petersson, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Greenlandic adoptees' psychiatric inpatient contact. A comparative register-based study

Unit of Women and Gender Research in Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mela{at}pubhealth.ku.dk.

	Abstract

Aims: The aim is to highlight adoptees’ and stepchildren’s psychiatric contact and diagnoses compared with non-adoptees. Methods: The setting is Greenland and the methodology is a comparative in-ward patient register-based study. The background is the Greenlandic tradition for adoption and community child care and international research stressing that adoptees demonstrate adverse health outcomes. The cohort is in-ward patients (>24 hours), born between 1973 and 2005. Correlation between various dependent and independent variables are analyzed. The research makes different comparative statements of psychiatric admissions and diagnoses related to adoptees and stepchildren compared to non-adoptees with respect to demographic and socioeconomic indicators. The psychiatric data material is collected from 1992 to 2008 and the socioeconomic indicators are included from 1996. Results: The findings show, contrary to findings related to adoptees in Western societies, that being an adoptee in Greenland does not increase the risk for psychiatric admission, but being a "female stepchild" does. The adjusted risk for adoptees is "non-significant" at 1.1 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.6–1.9) but the adjusted risk for female stepchildren is "significant" at 3.4 (95% CI 1.8–6.6). The most frequent diagnosis is "Inherent or acquired brain suffering". The findings open up possibilities for new hypotheses as to reasons for adoptees’ adverse health outcomes in the Western world. Conclusions: Epidemiological and medical contact recording do not exist outside central hospital level in Greenland, therefore, in order to put psychiatric contact patterns into perspective, in-depth field studies are required in close collaboration with the local Greenlandic population.

First published on October 30, 2009
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2009, doi:10.1177/1403494809352103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?