This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hörnquist, J. O. Articles by Hansson, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hörnquist, J. O. Articles by Hansson, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Long-term sick-listing, medical rehabilitation and life quality change

A patient evaluation

Jan Olof Hörnquist Department of Preventive and Social Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences Linköping University S-581 85 Linköping Sweden

Birgit Hansson

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, S-52885 Linköping, Sweden

This evaluation of the health service at one of the hospitals of the National Insurance Board in Sweden is primarily based on the perspective of the patient. One interview group of 32 patients (I-group) made life quality ratings before-after their hospital stay. In responding to a postal questionnaire one year after discharge from hospital, another group of 93 former patients (Q-group) made parallel self-ratings. Due to prolonged sick-listing, the patients had been admitted to the hospital for rehabilitation/examination according to paragraph 2: 11 in the general insurance law. The basis for their sick-listing was hereby critically reviewed. Within the framework of additional examinations (interview and structured general questions), more than 40% of the respondents stated that the hospital stay was mainly satisfying and a great majority appreciated the nursing care. However, the self-ratings showed that the patients did not ascribe any particularly great significance to the hospital stay. In the short term, it even seemed to have a certain negative impact on the life quality of the patients. No obvious positive bias seems to be built into the ratings. Thus, the assessment package applied may also work well in similar evaluative settings.

Key Words: Evaluation • Quality of life • Rehabilitation.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 2, 99-104 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/140349489101900204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?