SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, S. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, S. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Suggestion for Improving Intelligibility in Multivariate Confounder Adjustment Using Alcohol Intake and Birth Weight as an Example

A ‘Confounder Score’ Approach in Analyzing Continuous Data

Jørn Olsen

Institute of Social Medicine, University of Aarhus, Høegh Guldbergs Gade 8, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark

Sjurdur F. Olsen

Institute of Social Medicine, University of Aarhus, Høegh Guldbergs Gade 8, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark

Adjustment for multiple confounding is usually done by applying some kind of regression model. This requires assumptions about the type of relationship between the exposure of interest and outcome. It has been suggested to use confounder scores within strata of which the relationship can be scrutinised whihout such assumptions. Adjusting continuous outcomes for confounding factors, like birth weight for gestational age and lung function measures for age, is sometimes done by using the ratio of the observed outcome to an outcome expected from a reference series external to the study, with a concomitant risk of introducing new confounding. In some cases, the ideas from both these approaches can, slightly modified, be successfully combined. By using an internal rather than an external reference series, i.e. a group within the data with constant exposure, expected values for outcome can be derived as the fitted values from some model, appropriate for the purpose, depicting outcome conditional on all the potential confounders that are registered and for which control is desired. The relationship between the exposure of interest and the outcome, now represented by the fractional departure for each individual from the value expected conditional on her/his confounder status, can be scrutinised without any assumptions about the form of this relationship but, contrary to the confounder score approach, on the basis of the entire data set. This method also provides a way of presenting the relationship of interest, adjusted for confounding, that is easier to understand than the traditional regression approach. The impact of alcohol intake during pregnancy on birth weight will be given as an example.

Key Words: birth weight • confounder score • alcohol • epidemiology • birth weight ratio

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 4, 235-241 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/140349489101900404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement