| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Item bias in self-reported functional ability among 75-year-old men and women in three Nordic localitiesThe Glostrup Population Studies, Medical Department C, Glostmp County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, and Department of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Correspondence address: Dr Kirsten Avlund Department of Medicine Glostrup County Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Physical Education, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Department of Data Processing, County Hospital of Copenhagen, Herler, Denmark.
Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Göteborg, Sweden. The purpose of this article is to analyse item bias in a measure of self-reported functional ability among 75-year-old people in three Nordic localities. The present item bias analysis examines whether the construction of a functional ability index from several variables results in bias in relation to geographical locality and gender. Information about self-reported functional ability was gathered from surveys on 75-year-old men and women in Glostrup (Denmark), Göteborg (Sweden) and Jyväskylä (Finland). The data were collected by structured home interviews about mobility and Physical activities of daily living (PADL) in relation to tiredness, reduced speed and dependency and combined into three tiredness-scales, three reduced speed-scales and two dependency-scales. The analysis revealed item bias regarding geographical locality in seven out of eight of the functional ability scales, but nearly no bias in relation to gender in the combined data. The conclusion is that only one tiredness-scale (Lower Limb-T), one reduced speed-scale (Lower Limb-S) and the two dependency-scales (PADL-H and Mob-H) can be proposed for use in comparisons between the three localities (with removal of one or more items).
Key Words: Item bias Comparative study Functional ability Activities of Daily Living Mobility Tiredness Reduced speed Dependency.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 24, No. 3,
206-217 (1996) |
|||