This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hanson, B. S. Articles by Ranstam, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hanson, B. S. Articles by Ranstam, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reliability and validity assessments of measures of social networks, social support and control — results from the Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study

Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, Correspondence address: Bertil S. Hanson Department of Community Medicine Lund University SE-205 02 Malmö Sweden Tel: +46 40 332660 Fax: +46 40 336215

Per-Olof östergren

Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

Sölve Elmståhl

Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

Sven-Olof Isacsson

Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

Jonas Ranstam

Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

The reliability and validity of methods to assess social networks, social support and control were investigated in a population of 12,009 females and males born between 1926 and 1945 (the "Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study"). This study demonstrated an overall reliability with kappa coefficients between 0.70 and 0.47, but the reliability was more varying among females and lower in the youngest age group. The analysis of the construct validity indicated that the different indices measure different aspects of the psychosocial environment, but both theoretical and methodological problems were identified, when the validity of multidimensional concepts are to be determined. The validity of such indices can best be judged by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Potential validity problems must be kept in mind when these indices are used in epidemiological research. The results from the reliability analysis call for repeated assessments and the sample size must be adjusted vis-à-vis the reliability.

Key Words: social epidemiology • psychosocial factors • social support • reliability • validity

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 25, No. 4, 249-257 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/140349489702500407


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?