This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Armstrong, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Armstrong, D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

``Controversies in epidemiology'', teaching causality in context at the University at Albany, School of Public Health

University at Albany SUNY, Department of Epidemiology, SPH, Rensselaer, NY, USA

Social inequalities relate not only to disparities in health but also are the social context for theories of disease causality being legitimized or denied. In the discipline of epidemiology, conventional discussions on whether or not a given exposure ``causes'' a specific disease are framed almost exclusively as debates of validity and whether there is sufficient accumulation of evidence to satisfy ``Hill's Causal Criteria''. However, the way in which the conceptualization of disease processes is restricted to conform to the current causal paradigm, which is based on socially determined ideas of individualism, reductionism, monocausality and the legitimacy of social inequalities, can be identified as a fundamental assumption underlying conventional epidemiological debates of causality. Any argument that social inequalities are an important determinant of poor public health must also explicitly critique the current causal paradigm, which disallows epidemiologists from conceptualizing social relationships as causal of poor health in populations..

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?