This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cable, T. A. Articles by Slagsvold, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cable, T. A. Articles by Slagsvold, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Diets Health Literacy Healthy Living Smoking Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Lessons from the Oslo Study Diet and Anti-Smoking Trial: a qualitative study of long-term behaviour change

Family Practice Residency Program, Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN, Tennessee, USA

Eivind Meland

Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen? eivind.meland{at}isf.uib.no

Tone Søberg

University of Oslo, School of Medicine

Svein Slagsvold

Borgerud Health Centre, Oslo, Norway

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with sustainable behaviour change among persons at increased risk for future cardiovascular disease. A qualitative approach based on focus group interviews was used. Twenty-five men aged 62-71 years who participated in the Oslo Study Diet and Anti-smoking Trial were interviewed in four focus groups. The study identified five categories of factors linked to the process of lifestyle changes: the doctor-patient relationship, significant others, motivators, barriers, and empowerment. A strong personal attachment to the principal investigator of the Oslo Study was revealed. The relationship was described as friendly and supportive. The family based approach and the impact of spouses, in particular, was emphasized by the participants. Somatic symptoms and fear often acted as motivators to behavioural change. Individual feedback was also identified as an important motivator. Psychological resistance to external pressure, concerns regarding behaviour change, and benefits from current (unhealthy) behaviour were identified as barriers. Participants reported a process of empowerment and personal control as an important element of sustainable change. The importance of the unique relationship with a certain provider has implications for future healthcare planning. This factor may also limit the external validity of studies of human behaviour.

Key Words: health behaviour • health education • ischaemic heart disease • primary healthcare.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 27, No. 3, 206-212 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/14034948990270031301


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?