This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Anttila, S. K Articles by Pitkajarvi, T. K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Anttila, S. K Articles by Pitkajarvi, T. K Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Nursing Homes Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Cost-effectiveness of an innovative four-year post-discharge programme for elderly patients

Prospective follow-up of hospital and nursing home use in project elderly and randomized controls

Department of Social Services and Health Care, Tampere

Heini S Huhtala

School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere

Markku J Pekurinen

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland

Time K Pitkajarvi

Department of Social Services and Health Care, Tampere

The cost-effectiveness of a post-discharge programme on the use of hospital care and the continuity of care was assessed in an elderly cohort (n = 204) discharged from the city hospital. The participation rate was 97.6%, and the patients were aged 75 years or over and lived alone. The randomized controls (n = 204) received standard aftercare. During the follow-up the costs of university hospital care decreased by 52% in the intervention group and by 24% in the control group per patient year, compared with the costs in the year preceding the project. This happened despite the higher morbidity in the intervention group in terms of fractures and the use of university hospital care in the year preceding the project. There was also a tendency in the intervention group for the previous non-users of university hospital care to remain non-users during the follow-up. The costs of city hospital care increased by 16% and 5%, and of all hospital care by 1.3% and 0.2%, respectively. There were no differences in admissions to permanent care in the nursing homes. The intervention group did not make their first contact with the hospitals or permanent care in nursing homes earlier than the control group during the follow-up. The co-operation between hospital and domiciliary care and voluntary workers was well-suited to the innovative care of the elderly people.

Key Words: aged • prospective studies • intervention studies • health care costs • hospitals-utilization • nursing home utilization • patient education.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 28, No. 1, 41-46 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/140349480002800108


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?