This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fonager, K. Articles by Sabroe, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fonager, K. Articles by Sabroe, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A comparative analysis of different methods for obtaining estimates of alcohol consumption in a Danish population survey

Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, kf{at}soci.au.dk

Svend Sabroe

Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

Aims: The aim of the present study was to compare different measures of alcohol consumption used in a Danish survey. Methods: A stratified random sample was extracted from the Civil Registration System. From January 1997 to January 1998 approximately 8 telephone interviews were conducted every day, including Sundays and holidays, ending with a total of 3,050 interviews after 1 year. Two main approaches to measure alcohol consumption were used: the quantity-frequency and the recent occasion approaches; the latter is subdivided into previous week and previous day approaches. Results: The overall estimated number of units (= 12 g of pure alcohol) per week was 6.8 (95% confidence intervals (CI ): 6.5- 7.1) , 6.7 (95% CI: 6.4-7.1 ) and 8.5 (95% CI: 7.8-9.1 ) for the quantity-frequency, previous week and previous day approaches, respectively. A total of 50% of the men and 70% of the women did not drink alcohol the previous day. Among people classified as high consumers in the previous week and previous day approaches, less than 60% and 30%, respectively, were similarly classified in the quantity-frequency approach. Conclusion: There was agreement on the level of alcohol consumption between the quantity-frequency and previous week approaches, but higher estimates when using the previous day approach. The previous day approach varied more in relation to the interview day and season compared with the quantity-frequency approach and the previous week approach. The recent occasions approach showed some difficulties in classifying the individuals. If the alcohol consumption is included in a model as a risk indicator or a confounder, the quantity-frequency approach would be more preferable than the recent occasion approach.

Key Words: alcohol drinking • methodology • survey.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?