This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nafziger, A.N. Articles by Wall, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Nafziger, A.N. Articles by Wall, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Design issues in the combination of international data from two rural community cardiovascular intervention programs

Clinical Pharmacology Research Center & Department of Medicine, nafziger{at}iex.net, The Research Institute, Bassett Healthcare, Cooperstown, New York, USA

L. Weinehall

Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

C. Lewis

The Research Institute, Bassett Healthcare, Cooperstown, New York, USA

P.L. Jenkins

The Research Institute, Bassett Healthcare, Cooperstown, New York, USA

T.A. Erb

The Research Institute, Bassett Healthcare, Cooperstown, New York, USA

T.A. Pearson

Department of Community & Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA

S. Wall

Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Objectives: To compare and contrast two rural cardiovascular community intervention programs (CCIP) in northern Sweden and the US by discussing the methods used to select and combine similar data from two separately designed and implemented CCIP in order to describe and evaluate their effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular risk.

Methods: Two rural intervention populations and their reference populations were compared. A comparison was made of the intensity and duration of the intervention programs using an overall intervention intensity score. Population-based surveys were conducted at 5-year intervals in both countries. The methods used for data pooling and comparison are described. A description of statistical analyses using a mixed analysis of variance model is provided.

Results: The data were pooled, taking into consideration comparable ages. New variables were created in order to define the relationship between similar data that did not permit direct comparison.

Conclusions: Combination and comparison of international data from two programs allowed evaluation of community intervention programs that were developed independently for similar communities. The effectiveness of interventions can be compared using such methods.

Key Words: cardiovascular diseases • community health education • epidemiology • health survey • public health • rural health.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 29, No. 56 suppl, 33-39 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/14034948010290021601


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Emmelin, A. N. Nafziger, H. Stenlund, L. Weinehall, and S. Wall Cardiovascular risk factor burden has a stronger association with self-rated poor health in adults in the US than in Sweden, especially for the lower educated Scand J Public Health, March 1, 2006; 34(2): 140 - 149. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Weinehall, C. Lewis, A.N. Nafziger, P.L. Jenkins, T.A. Erb, T.A. Pearson, and S. Wall Different outcomes for different interventions with different focus!-- A cross-country comparison of community interventions in rural Swedish and US populations Scand J Public Health, June 1, 2001; 29(56_suppl): 46 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Weinehall, G. Hellsten, K. Boman, G. Hallmans, K. Asplund, and S. Wall Can a sustainable community intervention reduce the health gap? -10-Year evaluation of a Swedish community intervention program for the prevention of cardiovascular disease Scand J Public Health, June 1, 2001; 29(56_suppl): 59 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T.A. Pearson, S. Wall, C. Lewis, P.L. Jenkins, A. Nafziger, and L. Weinehall Dissecting the ``black box' ' of community intervention: Lessons from community-wide cardiovascular disease prevention programs in the US and Sweden Scand J Public Health, June 1, 2001; 29(56_suppl): 69 - 78. [PDF]