This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Manjer, J. Articles by Berglund, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Manjer, J. Articles by Berglund, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Invitation to a population-based cohort study: differences between subjects recruited using various strategies

Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö Sweden, jonas.manjer{at}smi.mas.lu.se

Sölve Elmstahl

Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö Sweden

Lars Janzon

Department of Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö Sweden

Göran Berglund

Department of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

Aim: The present study compares subjects recruited to a population-based prospective cohort study by community versus personal invitation, and subjects responding late versus early to personal invitation. Subjects were compared with respect to sociodemographic characteristics, selected lifestyle factors, cancer incidence and mortality. Methods: The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study recruited a total of 28,098 subjects between 1991 and 1996. Entire birth-year cohorts, born 1923-50, were recruited using community directed (passive) invitation, and a personal letter of invitation (active recruitment). Information on sociodemography and lifestyle was obtained using a self-administered questionnaire. Anthropometric measurements were assessed at a physical examination. Cancer incidence and cause of death were retrieved using record linkage with national registries. Results: Subjects responding to community directed invitation were older, and more often females, than participants recruited using personal invitation. Furthermore, participants recruited through passive invitation had a comparably more favourable situation with regard to sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. They also had a lower frequency of prevalent disease, lower incidence of cancer and lower mortality. Contrary to this, men were more likely to respond late to a personal letter of invitation and late responders were also older, as compared with subjects responding early to personal invitation. Furthermore, those who responded late had a comparatively unfavourable socioeconomic situation and were characterized by a high prevalence of current smoking, obesity, weight change, and prevalent disease. Conclusions: Subjects who are recruited using different strategies in population-based cohort studies may have different sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics, and may vary with regard to prevalent disease, cancer incidence and subsequent mortality.

Key Words: cancer incidence • cohort study • invitation • lifestyle • mortality • participants • recruitment • sociodemographic.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 30, No. 2, 103-112 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/14034948020300020401


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Carlsson, J. Merlo, M. Lindstrom, P.-O. Ostergren, and T. Lithman Representativity of a postal public health questionnaire survey in Sweden, with special reference to ethnic differences in participation Scand J Public Health, March 1, 2006; 34(2): 132 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF]