SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swart, W.
Right arrow Articles by de Haes, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Swart, W.
Right arrow Articles by de Haes, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Rotterdam Local Health Information System 1987-2000: from Rebus and the health barometer to the health monitor

Wim Swart

Department of Health Promotion, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Jan Bleeker

Department of Health Promotion, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Bleekerj{at}GGD.Rotterdam.NL

Willy de Haes

Department of Health Promotion, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam, The Netherlands

In this article the development of the Rotterdam Local Health Information System is sketched. Started as an offspring of the Healthy Cities Project of the WHO, the focus was very much on neighbourhoods. The data were presented by a software program, REBUS Vision. It was relatively new to gather information at the neighbourhood level, so not much consideration was given to the relative importance of data for research questions. This led to the need to condense the vast amount of data into some summary fi gure, the health barometer, which chose the 27 most important available neighbourhood indicators and divided these data into six groups leading to six scores in which a neighbourhood could be compared with the city mean, other neighbourhoods, or itself in time. Although REBUS Vision and the health barometer were reasonably successful, a frequently occurring criticism was that there was too much emphasis on the signalling of public health problems. This has led to the development of a health monitor that not only signals public health problems but also tries to identify determinants and to offer solutions on a health policy and promotion level.

Key Words: health indicators • health promotion • health policy • neighbourhood • REBUS Vision.

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 30, No. 59 suppl, 63-71 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/14034948020300031101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement