Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buhl, L.
Right arrow Articles by Sørensen, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buhl, L.
Right arrow Articles by Sørensen, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 32, No. 2, 130-135 (2004)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940310017526

Adverse events due to change in organization of problem drug users' treatment?

Lars Buhl

Medical Office of Health, City of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg, lars_buhl{at}regionoest.dk

Henrik Sælan

Medical Office of Health, City of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg

Tine Møller Sørensen

Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Aims: This study set out to identify any undesirable consequences of legislative change in the organization of the treatment of problem drug users (PDUs), which aimed to combine their social and medical care. Method: The method used was a register-based three-year follow-up prevalent cohort study. Results: On 1 January 1996, the law was changed to allocate unambiguous and undivided responsibility for the combined social and medical care of PDUs in Denmark. The main objective of the legislative change was to move PDUs from treatment by general practitioners (GPs) and at private clinics to treatment institutions under the control of the counties. The possibility remained that medical treatment could, however, continue to be given by GPs or private clinics, based on specific agreements. The study showed that at the end of the period, 31 December 1998, two-thirds remained in treatment at private clinics or at GP surgeries. During the period only 8% of users were at some time without methadone treatment; 2% remained without methadone treatment throughout the study period. Conclusion: The transition from GPs and private clinics to the county treatment centres went smoothly. The number of PDUs in MMT (methadone maintenance treatment) in the city of Copenhagen increased in the period 1995 to 1998. The average quantity of methadone given to the cohort increased during these years from 72 mg per day to 92 mg per day. The legislative change therefore did not result in a higher threshold for treatment or a more restrictive prescription of methadone. No adverse effect on crime, hospital admissions, or death could be attributed to the legislative change in treatment organization.

Key Words: methadone maintenance treatment • treatment change • treatment effect.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?