SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanne, B.
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanne, B.
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Swedish Demand—Control—Support Questionnaire (DCSQ): Factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency in a large population

Bjarte Sanne

Section for Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bjarte.Sanne{at}isf.uib.no

Steffen Torp

HENÆR Centre, Faculty of Health Science, Vestfold University College

Arnstein Mykletun

HEMIL Centre, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen

Alv A. Dahl

Department for Clinical Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway

Aim: This paper examined the psychometric properties of the Swedish Demand—Control—Support Questionnaire (DCSQ), which is a shorter and modified version of Karasek's Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ). Methods: The study encompassed 5,227 workers born in 1953—57 from the population-based Hordaland Health Study. DCSQ, a 17-item questionnaire, covers psychological demands, decision latitude, and social support in the workplace. The workers were manually classified according to the Standard Classification of Occupations. The main statistical methods were principal component analyses, and estimation of internal consistency and the subscales' shared variance by Cronbach's coefficient {alpha} and Pearson's correlation coefficients, respectively. Results: The study gave support to the tri-dimensional factor structure of DCSQ. Decision latitude tended to split into skill discretion and decision authority in skill-level homogeneous samples. The specificity of the item loadings was satisfactory except for ``conflicting demands''. The inter-correlation of the three main subscales was weak. The internal consistency of the subscales was generally satisfactory. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of DCSQ are satisfactory. Being shorter and easier to use than the more comprehensive JCQ, DCSQ represents an important alternative, particularly if respondent burden and data-collection costs need to be minimized.

Key Words: Demand—Control(—Support) Questionnaire • Job Demand—Control(—Support) model • Job Content Questionnaire

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 33, No. 3, 166-174 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940410019217


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement