SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwisler, A.-D. O.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwisler, A.-D. O.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Diseases
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cardiac rehabilitation services in Denmark: Still room for expansion

Ann-Dorthe O. Zwisler

Unit of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, ADO{at}niph.dk, National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark

Ulla I. Træden

Unit of Preventive Medicine and Health Promotion, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen

Jørgen Videbæk

Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen

Mette Madsen

National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark

Aim: European cardiologists agree that cardiac rehabilitation (CR) should be offered as an integrated part of cardiac care, and CR guidelines have been published. The authors aimed to ascertain the potential for expanding CR coverage at hospitals in Denmark. Method: A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among all hospitals receiving acute cardiac patients (n=67). The response rate was 79%, with no differences according to catchment area, number of beds, or geographical location. The hospitals were classified as having full CR if all core components (physical training, psychosocial support, dietary counselling, smoking cessation, and pharmaceutical risk factor management) were available during each of three phases: (I) in hospital; (II) outpatient; and (II) community-based services. Results: Many hospitals offered one or more of the CR components during phases I and II: physical training (77%; 77%), psychosocial support (89%; 79%), dietary counselling (85%; 89%), smoking cessation (94%; 68%), and clinical control by a physician (100%; 93%). The content varied greatly. Full phase I CR was offered at 57% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 44—70%) of the hospitals and 47% (95% CI: 34—60%) offered full phase II CR. Phase III CR was very rare (2% (95% CI: 0—6%). The numbers of patients receiving CR was not registered. Conclusion: Marked progress was made in the 1990s in implementing CR; nevertheless, the services are far from fully expanded. Denmark has great potential for improving CR services, as do most other European countries. CR activities need to be registered at Danish hospitals.

Key Words: Cardiac rehabilitation • Denmark • guidelines

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 33, No. 5, 376-383 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940510005824


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement