Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ihlebæk, C.
Right arrow Articles by Eriksen, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 33, No. 5, 401-406 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940510006094

Myths and perceptions of back pain in the Norwegian population, before and after the introduction of guidelines for acute back pain

Camilla Ihlebæk

The Research Unit, The Norwegian Back Pain Network, HALOS, University of Bergen, Norway, Camilla.ihlebaek{at}psych.uib.no

Hege R. Eriksen

The Research Unit, The Norwegian Back Pain Network, HALOS, University of Bergen, Norway

Aim: Deyo's seven ``myths'' about back pain are based on common misconceptions of causality and therapy of back pain. These myths were alive in the Norwegian population in 2001; this report investigates whether this is true two years later. Methods: A representative sample of the Norwegian population in 2003 (n=1,014) were asked to rate their agreement with the seven myths. Results: There is significantly less acceptance of all myths except ``Most back pain is caused by injuries or heavy lifting'' in 2003. Myths concerning the use and importance of X-ray were still common: 43% agreed that ``X-ray and newer imaging tests can always identify the cause of pain'' and 50% that ``Everyone with back pain should have a spine X-ray''. Low level of education is still associated with high acceptance of the myths, but the changes from 2001 are most pronounced for these groups. Conclusion: Perceptions in the general population in Norway are slowly changing to be more in accordance with existing knowledge on accurate behaviour and treatment of back pain. This may be related to introduction of new evidence-based guidelines. The difference between educational groups is reduced, but is still a challenge to health professionals and health authorities.

Key Words: Attitudes • beliefs • low back pain • musculoskeletal pain • perceptions • socioeconomic status • treatment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?