Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Werner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Malterud, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Werner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Malterud, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 33, No. 5, 41-46 (2005)
DOI: 10.1080/14034950510033363

``The pain isn't as disabling as it used to be'': How can the patient experience empowerment instead of vulnerability in the consultation?

Anne Werner

Centre for Women's Studies and Gender Research, University of Oslo, Norway, awe{at}htil.no

Kirsti Malterud

Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Norway, Research Unit and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Aim: This study explores how doctors can help patients transform vulnerability into strength, instead of increasing a feeling of disempowerment. Methods: The authors analysed their findings from four previously written articles based on qualitative interviews with 10 women with chronic pain, comparing the reported negative consultation experiences with the beneficial effects of good treatment experiences, in order to identify potentials for change. Results: Altering the way in which the women are encountered may empower and help them deal with a painful life. Doctors can challenge stereotyped macro-structures of women's ``unexplained'' pain as hysteria by admitting the shortcomings of medical knowledge. The blame is then put on the medical discipline instead of the individual patient who presents bodily symptoms or reveals help-seeking behaviour that does not fit with biomedical expectations of what illness is and how it should be performed. Thus, the vulnerable position described by the patients can be converted or transformed into strength or resources in spaces that promote empowerment through recognition. Conclusion: Although doctors may feel helpless or puzzled in the consultation, they must take the responsibility for turning the consultation into a space for empowerment of the patient.

Key Words: Chronic pain • doctor—patient relationship • gender • medically unexplained disorders • qualitative interviews • recognition `recovery competence' • rehabilitation • (women) patients' perspectives


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?