This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ainla, T. Articles by Voitk, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ainla, T. Articles by Voitk, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction in tertiary and secondary care hospitals in Estonia

Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, Tiia.Ainla{at}kliinikum.ee, Department of Cardiology, Tartu University Clinics, Tartu, Estonia

Toomas Marandi

North Estonia Regional Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia

Rein Teesalu

Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, Department of Cardiology, Tartu University Clinics, Tartu, Estonia

Aleksei Baburin

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia, Estonian Centre of Excellence in Behavioural and Health Sciences, Tallinn, Estonia

Märt Elmet

Department of Cardiology, Tartu University Clinics, Tartu, Estonia

Anita Lver

North Estonia Regional Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia

Margus Peeba

North Estonia Regional Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia

Jüri Voitk

North Estonia Regional Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia

Aim: To compare validity of AMI diagnosis and treatment of AMI patients between tertiary and secondary care hospitals in Estonia. Methods: Two tertiary and seven secondary care hospitals responsible for the treatment of most AMI patients in Estonia were included in the analysis. A random sample of 520 patients admitted to these hospitals with AMI in 2001 was taken from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund database. Medical records were reviewed by trained experts using a standardized data collection form. Results: Forty cases were excluded due to selection errors by the Health Insurance Fund. Of the remaining cases, a diagnosis of AMI was confirmed in 93.3% of cases in tertiary care hospitals and in 83.5% of cases in secondary care hospitals (p<0.001). A total of 210 cases from tertiary and 213 cases from secondary care hospitals with confirmed AMI diagnoses were included in subsequent analysis. Utilization of β-blockers, aspirin, and reperfusion therapy was similar in both types of hospitals. In tertiary care hospitals, ACE inhibitors and statins were more frequently used during hospital stay and recommended at discharge compared with secondary care hospitals. In-hospital mortality was similar in both types of hospitals both before and after adjustment. Conclusions: Tertiary care physicians adhered more strictly to the current definition and guidelines for the management of AMI than did secondary care physicians. However, there is still a need for further improvement in both hospital settings according to international guidelines.

Key Words: acute myocardial infarction • diagnosis • hospital type • treatment

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 34, No. 3, 327-331 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940500242019


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?