Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agardh, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Östenson, C.-G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agardh, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Östenson, C.-G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 34, No. 6, 665-668 (2006)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940600696395
© 2006 Associations of Public Health in the Nordic Countries Regions

The magnitude of bias in a cross-sectional study on lifestyle factors in relation to Type 2 diabetes

Emilie E. Agardh

Department of Molecular Medicine, Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Karolinska Institutet, emilie.agardh{at}phs.ki.se

Anders Ahlbom

Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Epidemiology, Stockholm Center of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden

Tomas Andersson

Department of Epidemiology, Stockholm Center of Public Health, Stockholm, Sweden

Claes-Göran Östenson

Department of Molecular Medicine, Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Karolinska Institutet

Aim: In cross-sectional studies it may be difficult to ascertain the temporal order of exposure and disease, which may have consequences for causal inference. The authors aimed to illustrate the possible magnitude of this potential bias using data from a cross-sectional study on coffee consumption and work stress in relation to type 2 diabetes. Methods: By a series of computer simulations the authors examined to what extent the observed negative association between type 2 diabetes and high coffee consumption and positive association between type 2 diabetes and high work stress could be due to reverse causality, by assuming that cases changed their exposures in response to development of the disease. Results: If the negative association between coffee and type 2 diabetes was a consequence of reversed causality, 30—40% of the cases would have to decrease their coffee consumption from≥5 cups of coffee per day to 3—4 cups per day and from 3—4 cups per day to≤2 cups of coffee per day. Moreover, approximately 60% of the cases would have to increase their work stress from low to medium work stress and from medium to high work stress, in order to produce the positive association with diabetes that was observed. Conclusion: Even if the type 2 diabetic patients to some extent may have changed their exposure in response to disease development, it seems unlikely that the associations observed between type 2 diabetes, coffee consumption, and work stress are due to this bias.

Key Words: epidemiology • cross-sectional studies • causal inference • type 2 diabetes • lifestyle


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?