This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ljung, R. Articles by Hallqvist, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ljung, R. Articles by Hallqvist, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Misclassification of occupation-based socioeconomic position and gender comparisons of socioeconomic risk

Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Division of Epidemiology, Stockholm Center for Public Health, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden,rickard.ljung{at}sll.se

Johan Hallqvist

Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Division of Epidemiology, Stockholm Center for Public Health, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden

Aims: Because occupational classification systems tend to be less precise in the female sector of the working market there has been concern that this might imply more misclassification of socioeconomic position among women, biasing comparisons of gender-specific socioeconomic differences in risk. Methods: The Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP) is a population-based case-control study of risk factors for incident myocardial infarction. The study base included all Swedish citizens aged 45—70 in Stockholm County during 1992—94, 550 female and 1201 male cases, and 776 female and 1538 male controls. The use of an occupational classification as the base for categorizing socioeconomic position was compared with socioeconomic position based on detailed self-reported information on job titles and work tasks. Results: Women are categorized into fewer occupational categories than men and the socioeconomic heterogeneity within occupational categories is substantial for women as has been reported by others. However, despite more occupational categories for male types of jobs the socioeconomic heterogeneity within occupational categories is actually larger for men, implying larger misclassification among men. In simulations with different levels of socioeconomic misclassification among women, the effects on the gender comparison of socioeconomic differences in disease risk were small and they were mostly compensated for by less misclassification among men. Conclusions: The findings do not support the assumption that misclassification of socioeconomic position among women due to a restricted working market and a crude occupational classification for female jobs is an important issue when comparing measures of socioeconomic inequalities in health between men and women.

Key Words: Socioeconomic position • gender differences • myocardial infarction • misclassification • social class • Sweden • synergy index

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 35, No. 1, 17-22 (2007)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940600777260


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?