This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hägerhed Engman, L. Articles by Sundell, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hägerhed Engman, L. Articles by Sundell, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

How valid are parents' questionnaire responses regarding building characteristics, mouldy odour, and signs of moisture problems in Swedish homes?

Department of Building Physics and Indoor Environment, SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, BorÅs, Sweden, Linda.Hagerhed-Engman{at}sp.se

Carl-Gustaf Bornehag

Department of Building Physics and Indoor Environment, SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, BorÅs, Sweden, International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, Public Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

Jan Sundell

International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Aim: Questionnaires are a cheap means of studying large populations but the information obtained from them is seldom validated. Earlier studies have reported both high and low levels of agreements between inspectors' observations and occupants' reports regarding home environmental factors that included moisture problems. The aim of this study was to validate information received from a questionnaire survey regarding building characteristics, mouldy odour, and signs of moisture problems in 390 Swedish homes. Method: In a case control study on the association between home environmental factors and asthma/allergy among children, 390 homes were visited by trained inspectors for ocular inspection of visible moisture damage and perceptions of mouldy odour. Their observations were then compared with questionnaire reports collected 18—24 months earlier from the families. Results: A high level of agreement was found between the inspectors' observations and the occupants' questionnaire reports on technical parameters. This included type of house, type of ventilation system, and foundation, particularly in single-family houses. There was low agreement regarding vinyl or linoleum floor coverings and indications of dampness and mouldy odour. However, the stronger the mouldy odour experienced by the inspector, the higher the level of agreement. Conclusions: The questionnaire was a quite reliable source regarding technical parameters of the home but not for dampness problems. The questionnaire was better for predicting buildings without problems than detecting problems of mouldy odour and visible indications of moisture. To increase the validity of future questionnaires, simple drawings or information on critical spots for dampness could be used.

Key Words: Dampness • inspections • moisture • mould • odour • questionnaire • validation

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?