This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bolin, K. Articles by Lindgren, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bolin, K. Articles by Lindgren, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Smoking, healthcare cost, and loss of productivity in Sweden 2001

Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund University Centre for Health Economics (LUCHE), and the VÅrdal Institute, Sweden

Björn Lindgren

Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund University Centre for Health Economics (LUCHE), and the VÅrdal Institute, Sweden, Bjorn.Lindgren{at}luche.lu.se

Aims: Objectives were (a) to estimate healthcare cost and productivity losses due to smoking in Sweden 2001 and (b) to compare the results with studies for Sweden 1980, Canada 1991, Germany 1996, and the USA 1998. Methods: Published estimates on relative risks and Swedish smoking patterns were used to calculate attributable risks for smokers and former smokers. These were applied to cost estimates for smoking-related diseases based on data from public Swedish registers. Results: The estimated total cost for Sweden 2001 was US$ 804 million; COPD and cancer of the lung accounted for 43%. Healthcare cost accounted for 26% of the total cost. The estimated costs per smoker were US$ 3,200 in the USA 1998; 1,600 in Canada 1991; 1,100 in Germany 1996; 600 in Sweden 2001; and 300 in Sweden 1980 (all in 2001 US$ prices). Conclusions: To reduce the prevalence of smoking is an issue worthwhile pursuing in its own right. In order to reduce the cost of smoking, however, policy-makers should also explore and influence the factors that determine the cost per smoker. Sweden seems to have been more successful than comparable countries in pursuing both these objectives.

Key Words: Canada • Germany • healthcare cost • loss of productivity • smoking • Sweden • USA

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 35, No. 2, 187-196 (2007)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940600858557


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Bolin, K. Wilson, H. Benhaddi, E. d. Nigris, S. Marbaix, A.-C. Mork, and H.-J. Aubin Cost-effectiveness of varenicline compared with nicotine patches for smoking cessation--results from four European countries Eur J Public Health, June 2, 2009; (2009) ckp075v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]