This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Norredam, M. Articles by Album, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Norredam, M. Articles by Album, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Review Article: Prestige and its significance for medical specialties and diseases

Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, m.norredam{at}pubhealth.ku.dk

Dag Album

Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Norway

Aims: The aim of this paper is to review the literature concerning the existence of prestige hierarchies for medical specialities and diseases. Moreover, the implications of prestige for priority setting in healthcare systems are discussed. Methods: The study is based on a review of the literature. Papers were obtained through the National Library of Medicine, PubMed. The search was conducted on 14 July 2005, and included articles from 1950 until that date. The medical subject headings ``disease'', ``illness'', and ``medical specialities'' were combined with the search word ``prestige''. A total of 183 papers were found. Only studies focusing on prestige hierarchies for medical specialities and diseases were included. The final search identified 20 articles, six of which specifically established hierarchies for medical specialities and diseases. Results: The review documented prestige hierarchies for medical specialities and diseases. Explanatory characteristics behind the distribution of prestige were identified. It was demonstrated that active, specialized, biomedical, and high-technological types of medicine practised on organs in the upper part of the bodies of young or middle-aged people were accorded high levels of prestige. Medicine with the opposite characteristics had low levels of prestige. Conclusions: Medical specialities and diseases differ with regard to prestige. Characteristics related to specialties and diseases determine their prestige. The authors suggest that differences in prestige bear consequences for actual priority setting in healthcare systems, and contend that this should be further investigated.

Key Words: Diseases • health services • inequity • medical specialities • prestige • priority setting • status

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 35, No. 6, 655-661 (2007)
DOI: 10.1080/14034940701362137


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?