This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Twine, R. Articles by Kahn, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Twine, R. Articles by Kahn, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluating access to a child-oriented poverty alleviation intervention in rural South Africa1

MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, rhian{at}agincourt.co.za

Mark A. Collinson

MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

Tara J. Polzer

Forced Migration Studies Programme, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

Kathleen Kahn

MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

Background: In April 1998, the South African government introduced the child-support grant as a poverty-alleviation measure to support the income of poor households and enable them to care for the child. Aims: This research aimed to measure equity of access to applications for the child-support grant in an area characterized by poverty. Three questions were addressed: (i) How does socioeconomic status affect the probability of a household applying for a child-care grant? (ii) What household and caregiver characteristics are associated with child-care-grant application? (iii) What barriers to access are experienced by households that do not apply for the child-care grant? Methods: The study population of 6,725 households with at least one age-eligible child was drawn from the Agincourt field site, a rural sub-district of South Africa. Data used were obtained from health and demographic surveillance, a child-grant questionnaire, and a household-asset survey. Descriptive cross-tabulations and multivariate logistic regression were used in the analysis. Results: Although these grants are intended as a pro-poor intervention, the poorest households are less likely to apply for grants than those in higher socioeconomic bands. Households in lower socioeconomic bands experienced barriers in accessing grants; these related to lack of official documentation, education level of the caregiver and household head, and distance from government service offices. Conclusions: Enhancing access will require improved provision of birth certificates and identity documents, efficient coordination and service provision from a range of rural government offices, and creative methods of communication.

Key Words: Agincourt • child support grant • children • demographic surveillance system • equity • inequalities • poverty alleviation • rural • socioeconomic status • South Africa

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 35, No. 69 suppl, 118-127 (2007)
DOI: 10.1080/14034950701430008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?