This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Waldenström, K. Articles by Härenstam, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Waldenström, K. Articles by Härenstam, A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Occupational Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Does the job demand—control model correspond to externally assessed demands and control for both women and men?

Department of Public Health Science, Division of Occupational Medicine at Karolinska Institutet, kerstin{at}waldenstrom.nu, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Stockholm county council, Stockholm, Sweden

Annika Härenstam

Department of Public Health Science, Division of Occupational Medicine at Karolinska Institutet and Department of Work Science, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Aims: To explore externally assessed demands and control for both women and men in each of the groups of the job demand—control (JDC) model, which itself was based on self-reported data. A specific aim was to better understand why health conditions among women with active jobs were as bad as those among women with high-strain jobs in some earlier studies. Methods: Expert assessments were made through direct observation and interviews concerning time pressure, hindrances, influence, and creative work tasks. The sample consisted of 203 men and women in 85 occupations. The four groups of the JDC model (high strain, low strain, active, and passive) were constructed from self-reported data. Results: Most comparative analyses of the JDC groups showed that external assessments corresponded to self-reports in the expected direction for both women and men, although not always statistically significant. However, in the active job situation, external assessments deviated from self-reports in different directions for women and men. Women had more hindrances and less influence over their work, while the situation was reversed for men. Women in active jobs worked more often than men in an organization with mostly female staff and in a predominantly female occupation. Conclusions: Associations between self-reported working conditions and health might be underestimated among women reporting an active job situation. Our findings contribute to the discussion on why the results in some studies show that active jobs among women are as hazardous for health as high-strain jobs.

Key Words: Exposure assessment • psychosocial working conditions

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 36, No. 3, 242-249 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494807085079


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?