This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Konu, A. Articles by Sund, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Konu, A. Articles by Sund, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

``Effectiveness'' in Finnish healthcare studies

Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, anne.konu{at}uta.fi

Pekka Rissanen

Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere

Mervi Ihantola

Intensium Ltd, Benchmarking Services, Kuopio

Reijo Sund

National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES), Helsinki

Aims: Evaluation of effectiveness is connected with prevailing paradigms, and the breadth and perspective applied therein exhibit differences. Effectiveness refers to the extent to which a given intervention or service produces health outcomes in individuals to whom it is offered. The aim of this paper is to clarify the concept of effectiveness evaluation in health care and present the ways in which Finnish healthcare studies use the concept of effectiveness. Methods: Through a systematic review of Finnish scientific journals in the healthcare research field, 25 original studies, 35 review articles, and 20 discussion papers were acquired. The inclusion criterion was that the word ``effectiveness'' was presented in the title or abstract. Results: In this study the effects of actions were evaluated through the process (outputs) or through the outcomes (harms and benefits). The word ``effectiveness'' is widely used in healthcare research in Finland; mostly in studies of orthopaedics, health services research, physiotherapy, rehabilitation, and psychiatry, yet the concept was explicitly defined in only three papers. Most studies used both process and outcome measures. The outcome indicators were usually disease-specific. Papers presenting only process outputs clearly showed a health service producer's perspective. Health-related quality of life as an outcome indicator was rarely used. Conclusions: In Finnish healthcare studies, the concept of effectiveness was rarely defined and effectiveness measures were often vague or even nonexistent. The meaning of the term had to be interpreted from the study methodology, measures, and indicators.

Key Words: Effectiveness • evaluation • health care

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 37, No. 1, 64-74 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494808098917


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Simonen, E. Vtanen, A. Konu, and M. Blom Effectiveness in political--administrative decision-making in specialized healthcare Scand J Public Health, July 1, 2009; 37(5): 494 - 502. [Abstract] [PDF]