This Article Immediate free access via SAGE Open Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free OA All Versions of this Article: 1403494808098505v1 37/2/131    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Manderbacka, K. Articles by Keskimäki, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Manderbacka, K. Articles by Keskimäki, I. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Change and persistence in healthcare inequities: Access to elective surgery in Finland in 1992—2003

Health Services Research, STAKES (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health), Helsinki, Finland, kristiina.manderbacka{at}stakes.fi

Martti Arffman

Health Services Research, STAKES (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health), Helsinki, Finland

Alastair Leyland

MRC Social and Public Health Science Unit, Glasgow, UK

Alison Mccallum

NHS Lothian Health Board, Edinburgh, UK

Ilmo Keskimäki

Health Services Research, STAKES (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health), Helsinki, Finland

Aims: Many countries experience persistent or increasing socioeconomic disparities in specialist care. This study examines the socioeconomic distribution of elective surgery from 1992 to 2003 in Finland. Methods: Administrative registers were used to identify common elective procedures performed in all public and private hospitals in Finland in 1992—2003. Patients' individual sociodemographic data came from 1990—2003 census and employment statistics databases. First coronary revascularisation, hip and knee replacement, lumbar disc operation, cataract extraction, hysterectomy and prostatectomy on residents aged 25—84 years were analysed. Age-standardized procedure rates by income quintile were calculated for both genders, and concentration indices were developed and applied to age-standardized procedure rates in 5% income groups for each study year. Results: Most procedure rates increased during the study period. Three trends emerged: declining inequality for coronary revascularisations, an increase and then a decline in cataract extractions and primary knee replacements among men, and positive relationships between income and treatment for hysterectomy and lumbar disc operations. Conclusions: Our results suggest that structural features — uneven availability, co-payments and plurality of provision — sustain inequity in access; decreasing inequities reflect directed service expansion. Increased attention to collective, prospective funding of primary and specialist ambulatory care is required to increase equity of access to elective surgery.

Key Words: Elective surgery • health services research • hospital use • socioeconomic equity

This version was published on March 1, 2009

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 37, No. 2, 131-138 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494808098505


SAGE Open article

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?