This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1403494809106545v1 37/6/654    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bonke, J. Articles by Borregaard, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bonke, J. Articles by Borregaard, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The prevalence of problematic gambling behaviour: A Scandinavian comparison

Rockwool Foundation Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark, jb{at}rff.dk

Karen Borregaard

Userneeds, Frederiksberg, Denmark

Aims: On the basis of a new large-scale screening for the prevalence of problematic gambling behaviour in Denmark, the aim of the study was: (a) to evaluate the effect of applying different screening tools; and (b) to compare gambling behaviour in Denmark with the prevalence of problematic gambling behaviour in other Scandinavian countries. Methods: The screening tools applied were the internationally validated SOGS-R and NODS. These were used within the same survey, thus allowing for comparison with surveys conducted in other Scandinavian countries where either the one or the other tool has been utilized. Results: The prevalence of at-risk gamblers, problematic gamblers and pathological gamblers was significantly lower in Denmark than in the other Scandinavian countries. This held true for both genders as well as for different age groups in comparisons of Denmark and Norway. Conclusions: There is a considerable variation in the prevalence of problematic gambling between the Scandinavian countries, with Denmark having the smallest number of gamblers with problematic behaviour. The variation might be due to national differences in gambling preferences, access to games, public policies concerning gambling, etc., but investigation of this would require further comparative research.

Key Words: Gambling mania • international comparison • screening

This version was published on August 1, 2009

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 37, No. 6, 654-660 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494809106545


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?