SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1403494809344360v1
37/7/674    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smeby, L.
Right arrow Articles by Claussen, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smeby, L.
Right arrow Articles by Claussen, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sickness absence: Could gender divide be explained by occupation, income, mental distress and health?

Lisbeth Smeby

Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway, lisbetsm{at}student.sv.uio.no

Dag Bruusgaard

Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

Bjørgulf Claussen

Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

Background: Women have more spells of sickness absence than men but the reasons for this are unknown. We wanted to see if occupation, working conditions, income, health and mental distress may explain this gender difference. Methods: In a health survey in 2000—01 of all Oslo inhabitants aged 40, 45, and 59/60 years, 11,072 (48.7%) participated. Survey data were linked to the National Insurance Administration and Statistics Norway for the 8,174 eligible for sickness pay in the next four years. Occupation, working conditions, general health and mental distress were self-reported, and income was from official statistics. Long-term sickness absence (>16 days) was calculated for 2001—04 as cumulative incidence and number of days reimbursed. Results: Cumulative incidence was 50.1% for women and 34.7% for men in the four years after the survey. An age-adjusted female overweight of 48% was only reduced to 41% by adjusting for occupation, working conditions, income, self-reported health and mental distress. Duration of long-term sickness absence was 17 days more for women than for men, and was not influenced by adjustments. Conclusions: We have not explained why women have more sickness absence than men, either by work-related factors or by general health or mental distress. Factors explaining the gender divide should be sought elsewhere.

Key Words: Gender • Norway • sickness absence • social security

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 37, No. 7, 674-681 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494809344360


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement