This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1403494809342309v1 37/7/728    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Evron, L. Articles by Fristrup, T. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Evron, L. Articles by Fristrup, T. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Barriers to participation in a hospital-based falls assessment clinic programme: an interview study with older people

Centre for Elder Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Denmark, lotte.evron{at}gmail.com, Department of Rehabilitation, Copenhagen University Hospital Frederiksberg, Denmark

Kirsten Schultz-Larsen

Centre for Elder Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Denmark, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Tine Fristrup

Department of Education, School of Education, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

Aims: To gain new knowledge about barriers to participation in hospital-based falls assessment. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 20 older people referred to falls assessment at a hospital-based clinic were conducted. A convenience sample of 10 refusers and 10 accepters was collected. Those who refused referral were recruited in relation to a systematic falls screening programme performed by preventive home visitors. Accepters were selected among 72 participants successively completing the falls assessment clinic programme. The time between the interviews was 12 months; different levels of knowledge were expected, owing to accepters’ participation in the programme. Interview transcriptions were thematically analysed. The analysis was directed towards identification of barriers to falls assessment. Results: Barriers to participation were categorized as being either within or outside the falls clinic, and included administration, time, communication, attitudes to fall prevention, and expected future costs. Accepters completing the programme expressed a feeling of being ‘‘met’’ in the system and maintaining authority over their own life, while the refusers expressed concern about the healthcare system taking over their life. Conclusions: This study indicates that older at-risk patients acknowledge their falls problem, but refuse to participate in hospital-based assessment programmes because they expect to lose their authority and to be caught up in the healthcare system. In order to transform the findings of this study to a public health message, we have to consider moving the focus of falls prevention strategies from disease control to the domain of health promotion in order to engage older adults in preventive healthcare.

Key Words: Accidental falls • aged • patient participation • qualitative research

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 37, No. 7, 728-735 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494809342309


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?