SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1403494809341095v1
37/7/758    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekholm, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kjøller, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ekholm, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kjøller, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The study design and characteristics of the Danish national health interview surveys

Ola Ekholm

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, oek{at}niph.dk

Ulrik Hesse

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark

Michael Davidsen

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark

Mette Kjøller

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark

Aims: The Danish National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark has carried out national representative health interview surveys among adult Danes in 1987, 1994, 2000 and 2005. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of the design, including the response rates of the four surveys. Methods: The samples in 1987 and 1994 are based on simple random sampling. The samples in 2000 and 2005 are based on stratified random sampling. In addition, all invited to the survey in 1994 were re-invited in both 2000 and 2005. Data were collected via face-to-face interview at the respondent’s home. Following the interview in 1994, 2000 and 2005, all respondents were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Results: The response rate for the face-to-face interview fell from 79.9% in 1987 to 66.7% in 2005 and the response rate for the self-administered questionnaire from 68.1% in 1994 to 51.5% in 2005. The decrease is particularly marked among the young. The mean interview length has increased from 33.3 minutes in 1987 to 50.2 minutes in 2005. Conclusions: The declining response rate in the surveys is a major concern and can pose problems in generalizing data from the surveys to the Danish population. However, these surveys are essential, as the information collected cannot be gathered by means of official statistical registers. Hence, efforts to increase the response rate will be important in the forthcoming surveys.

Key Words: Cross-sectional studies • data collection • follow-up studies • health surveys • sample size

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 37, No. 7, 758-765 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494809341095


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement