This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nguyen Duy Khe Articles by Diwan, V. K Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Nguyen Duy Khe, Articles by Diwan, V. K Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Faces of poverty: sensitivity and specificity of economic classifications in rural Vietnam

Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam, nguyenduykhe2002{at}yahoo.com, Division of International Health (IHCAR), Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Bo Eriksson

Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden

Do Nguyen Phuong

Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam

Bengt Höjer

Division of International Health (IHCAR), Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Vinod K Diwan

Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden, Division of International Health (IHCAR), Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Aims: Poverty concepts and measurements have occupied philosophers for centuries and are subject to debate by researchers. A wide range of possible measures have been developed and used. Most research is country specific and different methods produce different pictures of poverty. This study aimed to compare measures of poverty within an epidemiological field laboratory in Bavi District, northern Vietnam (FilaBavi) and specifically to find out whether the official economic classification made by the local authority matched other measurements of socioeconomic status. Methods: Structured questionnaires were used to collect socioeconomic information in 11,547 households. In addition, the official classification for individual households was recorded. Five economic indicators were constructed: income, expenditure, household assets, housing conditions, and local authority's estimation. Results: Official economic classification and housing score were symmetrically distributed, while assets score and particularly income were highly skewed. Design effects were high because of high intra-cluster correlations. No indicator was closely correlated with any other. Sensitivity and positive predictive value for poverty were generally low for all indicators. Discussion: The authors' findings do not suggest that any of the indicators used is substantially better than the other or better than the Official Economic Classification made by local authority. The results also show that no indicator is particularly useful to predict the values of any other indicator and different poverty indicators may classify different socioeconomic groups as poor.

Key Words: economic indicators • poverty measurement • socioeconomic status • Vietnam.

References

• Duncan GJ Income dynamic and health. Int J Health Serv 1996; 26: 419 - 44.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Dahlgren G., Whitehead M. Policies and strategies to promote equity in health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1992.
• Liberatos P., Link BC, Kelsey JL The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemic reviews. Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health Vol. 10, 1988.
• Mueller CW, Parcel TL Measures of socioeconomic status: alternatives and recommendations. Child Dev 1981; 52: 13 - 30.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Cortinovis I., Vella V., Ndiku J. Construction of socioeconomic index to facilitate analysis of health data in developing countries. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 1087 - 97.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Andress HJ Empirical poverty research in a comparative perspective: basic orientations and outline of the book. In: Andress HJ, editor. Empirical poverty research in a comparative perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.
• Berkman LF, Macintyre S. The measurement of social class in health studies: old measures and new formations. In: Kogevinas M et al., editors. Social inequalities and cancer. IARC Scientific Publications No. 138, 1997.
• MacPherson S., Silburn R. The meaning and measurement of poverty. In: Dixon J, Macarov D, editors. Poverty: a persistent global reality. London: Routledge, 1998.
• World Bank. Vietnam poverty assessment and strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1995.
• General Statistical Office. Analysis of results of surveys on rich and poor state in Vietnam in 1993. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House, 1994.
• Jencks C., Smith M., Acland H., et al. Inequality: a reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
• Otto LB Class and status in family research. J Marriage Fam 1975; 37: 115-32.
• Kamieniecki S., O'Brien R. Are social class measures interchangeable? Polit Behav 1984; 6: 41-59.[CrossRef]
• Spicker P. Definition of poverty: eleven clusters of meaning. In: Gordon D, Spicker P, editors. The international glossary on poverty. London: Zed Books, 1999.
• Gordon D., Spicker P. The poverty glossary. In: Gordon P, Spicker P, editors. The international glossary on poverty. London: Zed Books, 1999.
• World Bank. World development reports 1990: Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1990.
• Durkin MS, Islam S., Hasan ZM, Zaman SS Measurement of socioeconomic status for child health research: comparative results from Bangladesh and Pakistan. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1289-97.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• DaVanza J., Habicht J., Butz WP Assessing socioeconomic correlates of birthweight in Peninsula Malaysia: ethnic differences and changes over time. Soc Sci Med 1984; 18: 387 - 404.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Victora CG, Huttly SRA, Barros FC, Lombardi C., Vaughan JP Maternal education in relation to early and late child health outcomes: finding from a Brazilian cohort study. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 899 - 905.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Schoeman JH, Westaway MS, Neethling A. The relationship between socioeconomic factors and pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20: 435 - 40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Barreto TV, Rodrigues LC Factors influencing childhood immunisation in an urban area of Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 357 - 61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kroger A. Health interview surveys in developing countries: a review of the methods and results. Int J Epidemiol 1983; 12: 465 - 81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Ports R., Zeifang K. A description of the German general social survey test - retest and report on the stabilities of the sociodemographic variables. Sociol Methods Res 1987; 15: 177 - 218.[Abstract]
• Fabricant S., Kamara CW, Mills A. Why the poor pay more: household curative expenditure in rural Sierra Leone. Int J Health Plann Manage 1999; 14: 179 - 99.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 31, No. 62 suppl, 70-75 (2003)
DOI: 10.1080/14034950310015149


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nguyen Duy Khe Articles by Diwan, V. K Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Nguyen Duy Khe, Articles by Diwan, V. K Social Bookmarking                         What's this?