This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1403494808086984v1 36/3/303    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lazarus, J. V. Articles by Liljestrand, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lazarus, J. V. Articles by Liljestrand, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Birth Control Teen Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Lithuanian general practitioners' knowledge of confidentiality laws in adolescent sexual and reproductive healthcare: A cross-sectional study

¹ Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Lund University, Sweden
² Department of Family Medicine, Kaunas Medical University, Lithuania

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Background: In Lithuania, the legislation addressing confidentiality in adolescent healthcare is contradictory and vague. Previous studies have also revealed that medico-legal knowledge among physicians is poor, and attitudes play a correspondingly greater role than legal knowledge in ensuring the confidentiality of patients. Objective: To survey the knowledge of Lithuanian general practitioner (GPs) of legal issues surrounding confidentiality for minors in sexual and reproductive healthcare. Methods: A 41-item questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 607 GPs. Their legal knowledge was evaluated with respect to the provisions of the Lithuanian Law on the Rights of Patients and Compensation for Health Damage. The analysis included descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for the eight independent variables (age, gender, type, location, ownership, size, frequency of consultations, and existence of a written office policy). Results: The response rate was 73.5%. Of these respondents, 49.3% proved to be knowledgeable about legal standards protecting the confidentiality of adolescents in healthcare. Knowledgeability was found to be higher among GPs who had a written office policy that was based on the law. Respondents stated that the most important measure to improve confidentiality in adolescent healthcare would be the development of an explicit legal framework to address it. Conclusions: GPs unfamiliarity with existing confidentiality regulations implies that there are ways to improve confidentiality in sexual and reproductive care beyond merely changing the law. This study suggests the need for a comprehensive strategy, including the development of professional guidelines and written office policies coupled with legal educational programmes directed at GPs.

Key Words: Adolescent health services, confidentiality, general practitioner, Lithuania, reproductive health

First published on March 7, 2008, doi:10.1177/1403494808086984

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2008;36:303.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?