This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1403494808092250v1 36/7/728    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Haapea, M. Articles by Veijola, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haapea, M. Articles by Veijola, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Mental Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Non-participation in a field survey with respect to psychiatric disorders

¹ Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
² Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland, Academy of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
³ Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
⁴ Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere and Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
⁵ Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK, Department of Public Health Science and General Practice, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
⁶ Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Aims: Higher rates of psychiatric morbidity among non-participants may lead to biased estimates of prevalence and incidence in epidemiological studies of psychiatric disorders. We had a unique opportunity to explore psychiatric morbidity and non-participation in a large epidemiological survey including questionnaires and a clinical examination.

Methods: Members of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort were included in the study. In phase I, a postal questionnaire was mailed to all those with a known address in 1997 (N = 11,540). In phase II, all subjects living in northern Finland or the Helsinki area (N = 8463) were invited to a clinical examination. In phase III, clinical examination participants were given a questionnaire with psychological subscales to be filled in at home and returned by mail. The data on hospital-treated psychiatric disorders were obtained from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Educational level was obtained from Statistics Finland.

Results: The participation rates were 76%, 71% and 61% in phases I, II and III, respectively. Subjects with any psychiatric disorder participated less actively than those without any psychiatric disorder in all phases, in both genders and at all educational levels. Participation was not found to vary across specific disorders. Gender or education did not explain the association of psychiatric disorders with participation.

Conclusions: Owing to non-participation, the true prevalence of psychiatric disorders may be higher than the prevalence estimated from epidemiological field surveys.

Key Words: Attrition, birth cohort, follow-up, non-participation, survey

First published on July 22, 2008, doi:10.1177/1403494808092250

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2008;36:728.

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?