This Article Immediate free access via SAGE Open Free Full Text (Free OnlineFirst PDF) OA All Versions of this Article: 1403494808098505v1 37/2/131    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Manderbacka, K. Articles by Keskimaki, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Manderbacka, K. Articles by Keskimaki, I. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Change and persistence in healthcare inequities: Access to elective surgery in Finland in 1992–2003

¹ Health Services Research, STAKES (National Research and Development Centre forWelfare and Health), Helsinki, Finland
² MRC Social and Public Health Science Unit, Glasgow, UK
³ NHS Lothian Health Board, Edinburgh, UK

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Aims: Many countries experience persistent or increasing socioeconomic disparities in specialist care. This study examines the socioeconomic distribution of elective surgery from 1992 to 2003 in Finland. Methods: Administrative registers were used to identify common elective procedures performed in all public and private hospitals in Finland in 1992–2003. Patients’ individual sociodemographic data came from 1990–2003 census and employment statistics databases. First coronary revascularisation, hip and knee replacement, lumbar disc operation, cataract extraction, hysterectomy and prostatectomy on residents aged 25–84 years were analysed. Age-standardized procedure rates by income quintile were calculated for both genders, and concentration indices were developed and applied to age-standardized procedure rates in 5% income groups for each study year. Results: Most procedure rates increased during the study period. Three trends emerged: declining inequality for coronary revascularisations, an increase and then a decline in cataract extractions and primary knee replacements among men, and positive relationships between income and treatment for hysterectomy and lumbar disc operations. Conclusions: Our results suggest that structural features – uneven availability, co-payments and plurality of provision – sustain inequity in access; decreasing inequities reflect directed service expansion. Increased attention to collective, prospective funding of primary and specialist ambulatory care is required to increase equity of access to elective surgery.

Key Words: Elective surgery, health services research, hospital use, socioeconomic equity

First published on January 5, 2009, doi:10.1177/1403494808098505

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2009;37:131.

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2009


SAGE Open article

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?