SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1403494809102774v1
37/3/295    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iversen, M. G
Right arrow Articles by Kreiner, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iversen, M. G
Right arrow Articles by Kreiner, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Do surgical patients differ in the way they prioritise aspects of hospital care?

Maria G Iversen1, Karen Hasen1*, Morten Freil1, and Svend Kreiner2

1 Unit of Patient-Perceived Quality, The Capital Region of Denmark
2 Department of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Main objective: To investigate whether surgical patients have the same or different priorities within hospital care by examining whether the importance patients ascribe to different aspects of hospital care can be explained by how important they find aspects of hospitalization in general. Background: Few studies have investigated patient priorities within hospital care. Knowledge of patient priorities is important for the purpose of making quality improvements in hospital care. In relation to this, it is important to know whether different groups of patients have qualitative different priorities. Design and subjects: A postal questionnaire was mailed to 3676 surgical patients after discharge from five Danish hospitals. Out of this figure, 2380 participated in the survey and 1597 were qualified for inclusion in the analyses. Analyses: Data was analysed by graphical loglinear Rasch models. Thirty-six hospital care aspects were included in the final model. Main results and conclusions: To a great extent, patients agreed on the prioritised order of the hospital care aspects investigated. Avoidance of errors and professional health care skills had highest priority. Qualitative differences in priorities were mainly found among different age groups; the younger patients found that information was more important than the older patients, who on the other hand found continuity of care to be more important. Quantitative differences were observed, with patients harbouring different views on of the importance of hospital care in general; on average, women rated this slightly more important than men.

Key Words: Graphical loglinear Rasch models, hospital care, inpatients, patient experienced quality, patient priorities, surgical patients

First published on February 23, 2009, doi:10.1177/1403494809102774

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2009;37:295.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement